Saturday
02Dec2006
Another success in Moscow for Brit architects RMJM
Saturday, December 2, 2006 at 5:26PM 
RMJM, the British architects who were earlier this year given the green-light for the Moscow City Palace, above, have won another high profile contract in the Russian capital: The new Gazprom headquarters. It seems British design still leads the way. From The FT: -
The contest for the Gazprom contract was controversial, in part because of fears that the beauty of the Russian city would be tarnished by the building’s proposed height. RMJM defeated five other international architects for the commission to develop proposals for the $600m (€451m, £303m) tower in the historic heart of the city, close to the Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge and Smolny Cathedral.
Reader Comments (6)
ah yes, the same company that worked on the Scottish parliament.
that project costed 10 TIMES more than originaly quoted.
a building of the outstanding quality
is that a widely held view?
I haven't seen the Scottish parliament in the 'flesh,' but from what I've seen - it's something of a stonker. Way, way over budget though.
ah yes, that old chestnut - untainted observers (my foot!).
sterling prize. well all a lot of junk gets voted for on teh Turner prize.
complexity - well yes. the supplier is paid to manage this. if he does not he is incompetent.
i wonder if the NAO (national audit office) did a report on this and who did they blame for the absurd cost/wastage of my money. *smiling here...ok, ok. not directly from my pocket....but I only said it to make a point.
and please excuse me for asking, what is teh BBC's expertise in assessing large contracts. Did not realise that they expertise in auditng contracts or quality of project management.
and while I am in full flow, iI must admit that it is disconcerting to be having a discussion with someone who is in purdah.
Ah, Breath in and Breath out!
Lets get back to the Gazprom Tower.
What an building thats going to be! Fantastic!
St Petersburg is a city with a population in decline, and has been for a long time. Modern Architecture (done well) can complement old architecture. A development of this stature and quality shall be a catalyst for reinvestment in the city. I think it is a very good thing for the future viability St Petersburg as a living, thriving and beautiful place.
I think that the RMJM London Ltd option is amazing as a sculpture and is also most sympathetic to its surroundings.
OMA solution was much better